Challenging Agency Action and Inaction: The Problem of Leading a Horse to Water
Compelling an administrative agency to act or preventing the agency's decision from being implemented is a difficult objective. A lawyer needs to be thoroughly grounded in the more arcane aspects of administrative procedure, especially the procedures of a particular agency, the complexities of federal court jurisdiction, and then equally well-versed in how to prepare a record which can withstand even the most rigorous government defenses.
Regardless of whether the client wishes to use or to protect public land resources, there are common problems when the Department of the Interior (“DOI”), the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), or the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (“Forest Service”) simply fails to act or acts contrary to law. If the BLM or Forest Service issues a decision, there are procedures for an administrative appeal1 and then procedures to take the case to federal court. The legal options are less clear when no action is taken and years are allowed to elapse while the status quo remains in place. Certainly, members of environmental groups object when the BLM or the Forest Service fail to adopt allotment management plans for livestock grazing on specific allotments. Oil companies find themselves frustrated when public lands which are classified as available for sale under the Mineral Leasing Act2 never appear on the sale list, despite assurances that
This content is available from the following sources
Already a Subscriber? Sign In
Over 60 years of scholarship at your fingertips.
Buy the Publication
The book containing this article may be available in hard copy, or the article may be available individually. Please contact the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation at email@example.com or 303-321-8100.