Cross-Cultural Ethical Issues in International Mineral Development—The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
If you can't get jobs and contracts for your friends and relatives, what's the point of going into politics?1
Graft and corruption are not a stranger to the American political culture, as the above quotation illustrates. In fact, according to one authority, even indigenous Americans expect their leaders to favor relatives and clan members over other members of society, and it is considered a breach of one's family or clan obligations not to use one's political position in this manner.2 Joseph S. Nye defines corruption as behavior which deviates from the formal duties of a public role because of private-regarding (personal, close family, private clique) pecuniary or status gains; or violates rules against the exercise of certain types of private-regarding influence.3 Throughout the history of the United States, political reform efforts have arisen to stem bribery and other forms of political corruption. As the world has grown more inter-connected, and U.S. companies increasingly must operate in a global marketplace, [9-4] the U.S. Government has sought to export the reform effort, through prohibitions on foreign activities of U.S. companies.
[a] Local Culture and Local Standards Remain Notwithstanding “Globalization”
Notwithstanding the very real process of globalization of world economic systems and business ventures, politics, culture, and ethical t
This content is available from the following sources
Already a Subscriber? Sign In
Over 60 years of scholarship at your fingertips.
Buy the Publication
The book containing this article may be available in hard copy, or the article may be available individually. Please contact the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation at email@example.com or 303-321-8100.