Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid: Dealing With Public Perceptions of Risk in Oil and Gas Development
As oil and gas development increasingly encroaches on the “backyards” of residents of towns and cities, many residents say they fear the health and environmental risks caused by the oil and gas operations. As a result, concerned citizens and activists increasingly oppose oil and gas development projects through lawsuits, referendums, and legislation. Often, the public has demanded that industry “prove” that operations are safe before moving forward. Facing that opposition, the oil and gas industry typically attempts to show that its operations are safe using fact-based and logical arguments that focus on (1) explaining how the operations actually work, and (2) how heavily regulated the operations are. The public often seems to ignore these arguments and to perceive the risk of oil and gas development differently from the industry. This chapter examines how this risk perception problem poses a conundrum for the oil and gas industry, and addresses whether the industry can convince a skeptical public that the risks inherent in exploration and production are acceptable.
As members of society, we accept as common sense the maxim that it is “better to be safe than sorry.” We make decisions based on assessments of acceptable risk. Knowingly or not, we choose to accept certain environmental and health risks in return for the economic or other benefits derived from oil and gas dev
This content is available from the following sources
Already a Subscriber? Sign In
Over 60 years of scholarship at your fingertips.
Buy the Publication
This article appears in:
61st Annual Institute Proceedings (2015)