American Law and Jurisprudence on Fracing
The United States may soon go from natural gas importer to exporter thanks to advancements in the use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have been hailed as revolutionary in their impact. These technologies and their broad application across a number of states, some with little experience in oil and gas drilling, have been met with appreciation, invective, and anxiety. For many, the exploitation of hydrocarbon-bearing shale formations carries the promise of transforming the prospects of the oil and gas industry, as well as world energy trade, geopolitics, and climate policy But, as we say in Texas, no matter how flat the pancake there is always another side, and the practice of hydraulic fracturing is not without its critics. The critics come in several guises, not surprisingly the environmentalists, a coterie of whom regard this technology's advancement as a broad-scale threat to water, air, and terra firma. There are also the regulators who, at the federal, state, and local levels, are clamoring to protect their turf or carve out new turf from existing regulatory regimes. This is the backdrop for this chapter, an earlier version of which in 2010 sought to critically examine the revolution in hydraulic fracturing from a number of perspectives. Recognizing the subject as dynamic from the technical, legal, regulatory, environmental, economic, and political pers
This content is available from the following sources
Already a Subscriber? Sign In
Over 60 years of scholarship at your fingertips.
Buy the Publication
The book containing this article may be available in hard copy, or the article may be available individually. Please contact the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation at email@example.com or 303-321-8100.